We
have all told a story or two at some point, and so why not share a few jots on
an opinion about telling stories.
Writing
a story does not begin with a concept or belief or ideology. It begins with a
person or two, a place with some dirt, and an event that is just real enough to
believe and just fantastic enough to be worthy of telling. Flannery O’Connor
claimed that if a writer begins with a person, there is no telling what will
happen next.
When
he was writing novels, especially The
Idiot, Fyodor Dostoevsky was constantly conflicted about who was related and what they
would end up doing. His novels are famously ideologically driven, and
that is one of the reasons I enjoy his novels so much. But the ideologies are
there only so long as people with all their psychological and moral complexity
and ambiguity are there.
Where
does a person begin? It could begin with a phrase, “Call me Ishmael.” It could
begin with a suggestive circumstance. Hazel Motes sat on the train leaning one
way and looking another; similarly, Raskolnikov walked down the stairs slowly
as if indecisively. A person begins with movement, be it speech or gesture.
Oceans and rivers and trains move and define people. Family reunions with all
their potential explosiveness can move and define people as much as oceans.
But
in any case, why would I be particularly interested in holding an opinion about writing fiction other
than wishing to write fiction that is not quite terrible? Telling the stories
of the Bible, following the movements of people with all their baggage and
strangeness, crafting sermons that follow the contours of the biblical
narratives themselves. That’s why. At least part of it.
Walter
Brueggemann has developed the rather interesting description of the preacher as
poet, and he explains, “The preacher is called to weave an artistic connection
between the text in its elusive, liberated truth, and the congregation in its
propensity to hear the text in forms of reductionism” (Finally Comes the Poet). He does not encourage this description of
preacher as poet because telling stories is neat. Rather, through narrative the
preacher calls the congregation into an alternative reality, a reality that is
different than the controlled ideological reality that so often gives shape to
our experience. The poet preacher calls the congregation into an alternative
reality of God’s promises. God’s promises of restoration involve people and movement,
and this movement defines the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment