One
of the many transitions from childhood to adulthood is discovering that life is
uncontrollably precarious, albeit life can hardly be described so simply as
supposing there are actual stages such as childhood and adulthood. There
remains, however, this discovery that even our parents are mortals. Moreover, in
some sense, life requires some sort of faith in so far as living requires trust
in much that is not seen or known by us, and faith as such is risky business. We
will hardly ever know if the next piece of earth on which we place our foot
will collapse beneath us.
As
we live with faith in the midst of change, our frameworks and stories according
to which we experience relationships, events, and statements often change over
time. Our paradigms of believing and understanding will likely change with time
and experience. As the tides of life cast us to and fro, what we once held as
true may change or be nuanced in various ways. This may sound terrible and
undesirable, but I think it may not be too dissimilar from a child maturing
and learning to use a language. A child learns the alphabet, some words,
grammar, and eventually crafts a high school book report. The high school kid writing that book report has changed since learning the alphabet. Writing the
letters of the alphabet all in a row is no longer the primary concern; the
child has since discovered new paradigms according to which it makes good sense
to write the letters all jumbled and out of order with periodic gaps between
the letters. Change can be a good thing, though it remains a bit disconcerting.
It
is not at all uncommon for churchy high school students to go to college and
then drop out of church. This may very well happen for a variety of reasons,
and I will not suppose that I can sum up in a few jots the depth and breadth of
why this happens. However, it strikes me with little surprise that it does
happen. When I went to college and began studying philosophy of religion it was
as if I was encountering a different language that seemed to undermine my
previously known language. In retrospect I realize that it may have been a bit
like suddenly learning to write my name in cursive after knowing only how to
print my name. In any case, it felt at times like the piece of earth on which I
was placing my foot crumbled, but as it did, it made me all the more curious. I
wanted to know why it felt as though the ground seemed to collapse.
Ideologically, I began moving from childhood to adulthood. The world appeared
more complex and precarious than before. Not only were my parents most
assuredly mortal, their teaching was not infallible in the least.
In
the midst of all the change, then, I began asking myself, “are my frameworks
and stories according to which I live malleable, supple, and robust enough to
live through these changes, these newfound languages?”
To
live through change, faith, lest we slip into despair, is a crucial ingredient.
As
risky as faith may be, faith is immeasurably rewarding. Memories of packing up
a trailer and moving from Paso Robles to Pasadena come to mind. Esther and I
hadn’t a clue what in the world we were doing, and similarly when we married
each other, we had hardly more than a few hints about what we were plunging
into. Even now, as Esther and I move from Pasadena, we are stepping into a
shadow-filled corridor. To marry, to move, to live in relationship requires rather
irrationally large and perhaps even seemingly naïve amounts of faith, but as
enormous and risky as faith may be, to be in relationship is deeply rewarding.
Moreover, just how rewarding it is cannot be known; it cannot be even imagined
until the risk is taken.
I
would feel nothing short of cliché if I were to compare such faith to living
into the story of Jesus; however, though there may not be worthy analogs
between the sorts of risks I have mentioned, nonetheless, living into the story
of Jesus involves both risk and reward, though the sorts of risks and rewards
involved will likely not be the same as winning the state lottery. Rather, Jesus
calls us to risk our very being that we might discover what it means to be.
In
a letter to Mme Fonvizina, Dostoevsky exclaimed, “If someone proved to me that
Christ is outside the truth, and that in
reality the truth were outside Christ, then I should prefer to remain with
Christ rather than with the truth.” This may sound like nothing other than a
resounding irrational leap of faith; however, I think it is not merely that.
Dostoevsky, of all people, knew of the risks and unpredictable turns life can
and will take. He knew. There may
very well be times when what was previously known with such conviction crumbles
beneath our feet, like sand slipping through our fingers. He knew. He also knew that whatever
happened he was completely transfixed, taken captive by Christ, and nothing
could change that, even a paradigm of judgment that counted Christ outside the
truth.
Dostoevsky’s
declaration of devotion to Christ is not childish naïveté; this is experience
speaking. This is a declaration of tenacious faith in the midst of uncertainty;
however, in the midst of whatever degree of darkness and ambiguity, there is a
single core trust according to which other steps are taken no matter how brittle and
thin the ground may be, no matter how bleak the grayish hue of light makes our
circumstances appear.
No comments:
Post a Comment